DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 34

1
Two decades of sign language and gesture research in Australia: 2000–2020
Green, Jennifer; Hodge, Gabrielle; Kelly, Barbara F.. - : University of Hawaii Press, 2022
BASE
Show details
2
Two decades of sign language and gesture research in Australia: 2000–2020
Kelly, Barbara F.; Hodge, Gabrielle; Green, Jennifer. - : University of Hawaii Press, 2022
BASE
Show details
3
Child language documentation: The sketch acquisition project
Hellwig, Birgit; Defina, Rebecca; Kidd, Evan. - : University of Hawai'i Press, 2021
BASE
Show details
4
Child language documentation: The sketch acquisition project
Hellwig, Birgit; Defina, Rebecca; Kidd, Evan. - : University of Hawai'i Press, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
Revisiting significant action and gesture categorization ...
Gawne, Lauren; Kelly, Barbara F.. - : La Trobe, 2020
BASE
Show details
6
Data Transparency and Citation in the Journal Gesture ...
BASE
Show details
7
Data transparency and citation in the journal Gesture
Gawne, Lauren; Krajcik, Chelsea; Andreassen, Helene N.. - : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2019
BASE
Show details
8
Data Transparency and Citation in Gesture
BASE
Show details
9
Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions
Gawne, Lauren; Kelly, Barbara F.; Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L.. - : University of Hawaii Press, 2017
BASE
Show details
10
Appendices for "Survey of Current Reproducibility Practices in Linguistics Journals, 2003-2012."
BASE
Show details
11
Supplemental files for "Survey of Current Reproducibility Practices in Linguistics Journals, 2003-2012."
BASE
Show details
12
Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions
Gawne, Lauren; Kelly, Barbara F.; Berez-Kroeker, Andrea L.. - : University of Hawaii Press, 2017
BASE
Show details
13
Reproducible Research in Linguistics: A Position Statement on Data Citation and Attribution in Our Field
In: Linguistics, 2017. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter (2017)
BASE
Show details
14
Putting practice into words: Fieldwork methodology in grammatical descriptions
BASE
Show details
15
04 - Data citation: State of the art in linguistics
BASE
Show details
16
Putting practice into words: Fieldwork methodology in grammatical descriptions
Abstract: Language documentation and description are closely related tasks, often performed as part of the same fieldwork project on an un(der)-studied language. However, since Himmelmann (1998) we have been encouraged to consider that documentation and description are methodologically different, and that data collected with documentary methods can enable verification of descriptive claims based upon them. The last decade has seen a surge in the literature on good fieldwork methodology, including Gippert, Himmelmann & Mosel (2006), Crowley (2007), Bowern (2008), Chelliah & De Reuse (2011) and Thieberger (2012). The result is that linguists are more aware of good methodological practices for data collection than ever. These include attention to metadata about speaker demographics, setting, linguistic and discourse types; information about tools, equipment, and stimuli; a description of the fieldwork conditions including time spent among speakers; and a description of archiving practices and locatability of data. However, it is not clear that linguists' awareness of the importance of robust data-collection methods is translating into transparency about those methods in resultant publications. Clear methodological description is a hallmark of reproducible and reliable scientific research (Author 2014, Authors In Prep), but documentary and descriptive linguists rarely receive clear advice on how to discuss the methods they use. In this paper we present a survey of 50 published grammars, 50 grammar-based dissertations and 200+ journal articles with regard to how explicitly authors discuss their data collection methods, and what kinds of information they include. The publications surveyed were selected from a ten-year period beginning five years after Himmelmann 1998 encouraged the use of language documentation to provide verification for language description; journal articles come from nine journals selected for breadth of geography, linguistic subfield, and theoretical approach. We find that while there are some examples of strong methodologically-driven writing, the majority of authors do not include key documentary metadata or methodological information. The result is that it is often difficult or impossible to verify or reproduce descriptive linguistic claims, making descriptive linguistics one of the few social sciences to not require researchers to back up claims with an explicit statement of methodology. We acknowledge that descriptive linguists often practice good methodology in data collection, but need encouragement to make this clear in their writing. Thus we conclude with clear benchmarks for the kind of information we believe is vital for creating a rich and useful research methodology in both long and short format descriptive research writing. References Author. 2014. [Title omitted for anonymity]. In Amanda Harris, Nick Thieberger & Linda Barwick (eds.), Research, records, and responsibility: Ten years of the Pacific and Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures. Sydney: University of Sydney Press. Authors. In prep. Citation and transparency in descriptive linguistics. Bowern, Claire. 2008. Linguistic fieldwork: a practical guide. Basingstoke [England] ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Chelliah, Shobhana L., and Willem J. De Reuse. 2011. Handbook of descriptive linguistic fieldwork. London: Springer. Crowley, Terry. 2007. Field linguistics: a beginner's guide. Edited by Nicholas Thieberger, Oxford linguistics. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. Gippert, Jost, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, & Ulrike Mosel. 2006. Essentials of language documentation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1998. "Documentary and descriptive linguistics." Linguistics no. 36:161–195. Thieberger, Nicholas. 2012. The Oxford handbook of linguistic fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/25256
BASE
Hide details
17
Finding Common Ground: Sign Language and Gesture Research in Australia
In: Australian journal of linguistics. - Basingstoke, Hampshire : Taylor & Francis 34 (2014) 2, 185-192
OLC Linguistik
Show details
18
Revisiting Significant Action and Gesture Categorization
In: Australian journal of linguistics. - Basingstoke, Hampshire : Taylor & Francis 34 (2014) 2, 216-233
OLC Linguistik
Show details
19
Temporal synchrony in early multi-modal communication
In: Language in interaction (Amsterdam, 2014), p. 117-138
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
20
Revisiting Significant Action and Gesture Categorization
Gawne, Lauren; Kelly, Barbara F.. - : Taylor and Francis, 2014
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
21
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern